Your test market campaign is measuring people who are not in the market
The default geographic targeting setting serves your ads to people located in the territory you chose, and also to people interested in it from elsewhere. For an ordinary campaign that is often what you want. For a campaign whose only purpose is to learn whether a new market responds, it makes the result unusable.
- Google documents that the default option targets people present in, regularly in, or showing interest in the chosen territory. You have to change it by hand to limit yourself to presence.
- On a market entry test, that default mixes two populations from which you would draw opposite conclusions: buyers in the territory and people who are not there.
- The setting lives in the advanced location options, campaign by campaign. It is not set once for the account.
- Google states that targeting relies on several signals and that complete accuracy is not guaranteed. Even on strict presence, a margin of error remains.
- Geographic exclusion carries its own setting. Excluding a territory without configuring it lets through part of the traffic you thought you had ruled out.
On this page
Presence targeting
Presence targeting limits delivery to people who are, or regularly are, in the chosen territory. It stands against presence or interest targeting, the default setting, which adds people who have shown interest in that territory from elsewhere. The distinction does not only change the volume: it changes the nature of the population being measured, and therefore what a campaign result allows you to conclude.
What the default setting actually does
Google's help is explicit on this point. The default option, presented as recommended, targets people located in the chosen territory, people regularly located there, and people who have shown interest in that territory. To restrict delivery to people physically present, you have to change that setting.
It is not a badly designed default. For a hotel operator in Quebec City, someone searching from Toronto is exactly the intended customer. For a school, a travel agency or a property developer, the person interested from a distance is often worth more than the resident. Google even puts a number on the gain: travel, real estate and education advertisers who widened their targeting saw 5% more conversions on the search network, according to internal 2022 data cited in its help.
The problem appears when the campaign's objective is not to sell but to learn. A manufacturer opening Ontario does not want extra conversions from elsewhere. It wants to know whether Ontario buyers are searching for its product, at what cost, and with what enquiry rate. The default setting gives it an aggregate figure that mixes both populations without separating them.
One nuance Google states itself is worth keeping: targeting relies on several signals, device settings and behaviour among them, and the company says it does not guarantee complete accuracy. Even on strict presence, a margin of error exists. It is small, it is not zero, and a management team deciding on fifty enquiries needs to know that.
Why it destroys a market entry test
A market test answers one question: does this territory, on its own, produce demand at an acceptable cost. Every person measured who is not in the territory pollutes the answer, and pollutes it in both directions.
Upward first. Some of your clicks come from people outside the market, often expatriates, comparison shopping or professionals watching the competition. They click, a few fill in a form, and your cost per enquiry looks better than it is. You conclude the market responds, you commit the next budget, and the conversion into sales does not follow.
Downward next, and this one is more insidious. Those same clicks consume a finite daily budget. Every dollar spent on a person outside the market is a dollar that did not serve to measure the market. On a test with a tight budget, that translates into a volume too small to conclude anything within the planned window.
The practical consequence is the same either way: the test costs what it costs and settles nothing. This is not a loss of a few percent, it is an expansion decision taken on data that was not measuring what everyone believed.
The questions to ask before launching a market test
This setting gets no line in a monthly report. It shows up neither in the cost per click, nor in the conversion rate, nor in the number of enquiries. A management team that wants a reliable answer therefore has to ask for it explicitly, because nobody will mention it on their own.
- Is this campaign meant to sell in the market or to learn whether it exists? The two objectives do not share a setting.
- Is targeting set to presence, campaign by campaign, and who verified it?
- What share of our clicks comes from outside the territory, and is that figure tracked?
- Does our test budget reach the volume of enquiries needed to conclude, once out-of-market clicks are removed?
- On what date and on what number do we decide the market responds or does not?
The useful answer separates the selling campaign from the measuring campaign and names the setting used. An answer about reach and opportunity describes an intention, not a protocol.
Building a market entry test that actually settles the question is part of what we cover in a paid audit.
The exclusion trap
It is the mirror image of the first one and it costs more, because everyone believes it is handled.
Excluding a territory does not work the same way depending on a second setting, specific to exclusions. Google's developer documentation puts it without ambiguity: you can target a country including people who are merely interested, while excluding a specific state on presence alone. The result is precise, and it is not what you get by default.
The concrete case is common among exporters. You sell across the United States except in two states where you hold no licence. You exclude them, you sleep soundly, and your ads keep appearing to people in those states under certain configurations. Every click is an expense doubled by a regulatory risk.
The check takes two minutes per campaign and appears on no standard checklist: open the advanced location options, and read both settings, the one for inclusions and the one for exclusions.
A default setting is not a recommendation for your situation. It is the compromise that suits the largest number of advertisers, and a market test is never the average case.
Falia analysis gridThe setting by objective
| Objective | Setting | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Test whether a new market produces demand | Presence | The answer only counts if it comes from the territory being measured. |
| Sell in a market already validated | Depends on the product | A product delivered on site stays on presence, a service consumed remotely does not. |
| Hospitality, tourism, education, real estate | Presence or interest | The buyer plans from elsewhere. Google puts the gain at 5% more conversions. |
| Sales or service limited to a territory | Presence | A person outside the territory cannot become a customer, however interested. |
| Excluding a territory for regulatory reasons | Presence on the exclusion | It is the only setting that genuinely rules out the people located there. |
The check almost everyone skips is the geographic report, available in the account and never opened. It shows where the clicks came from, by region, and it reads in five minutes. On a market entry test, it is the only evidence that you measured what you believed you were measuring. Do it at the end of the first week rather than at the end of the test: a badly configured campaign corrected on day seven costs a week, corrected on day sixty it costs the decision.
Before launching
The full market entry sequence is set out in your export plan does not say where the customers will come from. Account structure is covered in Google Ads: structure, exclude, measure, the profitability calculation in the break-even threshold of a campaign, and how long a test needs in how long it takes to test an ad. The choice of test platform is covered in the second engine as a market's first test.
The amount to put behind this setting to get a readable answer is calculated in what to do when the budget falls short.
Opening a market is the subject of the Develop a new market goal.
The lever for this work is paid advertising.
Frequently asked questions about geographic targeting
What is the default geographic targeting setting?
Google documents that the default option, presented as recommended, targets people present in the territory, people regularly there, and people who have shown interest in that territory from elsewhere.
Should you always set it to presence?
No. For a market entry test, yes, because the answer only counts if it comes from the territory. For a hotel, a school or a property developer, the buyer plans from elsewhere and widening is justified.
Does the setting apply to the whole account?
No, it is set campaign by campaign in the advanced location options. A campaign added later picks up the default again, which is why a well-configured account drifts over time.
Is excluding a territory enough to stop appearing there?
Not necessarily. Exclusions carry their own setting. An exclusion set to presence rules out the people located there, whereas the default behaviour can let part of that traffic through.
Is geographic targeting accurate?
Google states that it relies on several signals and does not guarantee complete accuracy. The margin of error is small but real, and it is worth knowing when a decision rests on a small number of enquiries.
How do you check where our clicks really came from?
Through the account's geographic report, which breaks clicks down by region. It reads in five minutes and it should be consulted at the end of a test's first week, not at the end of the test.
- Google Ads, Target ads to geographic locations, help centre, consulted August 2026. How targeting works, the default setting, the signals used and the absence of any guarantee of complete accuracy.
- Google Ads, About advanced location options, help centre, consulted August 2026. Distinction between presence and presence or interest, and Google internal data from 2022 on the travel, real estate and education sectors.
- Google Ads API, Location targeting, developer documentation, updated July 2026, consulted August 2026. Separate setting for geographic exclusions.
Gabriel almost always takes your first call and carries out your audit. He builds the strategy starting from your growth goal: where to put your budget, which market to test and how to connect each lead to a real sale in your CRM. He mainly leads engagements for three goals: Optimize the profitability of your digital campaigns, Develop a new market, and Generate demand and growth. With Geneviève, he also works on organic search (SEO), AI visibility (GEO) and conversion rate optimization (CRO). The sales a Google Ads or Meta Ads campaign brings in depend on the page that receives the click. He writes mainly about marketing strategy, paid advertising and measurement.
About Falia →
SEO
Paid advertising
Conversion
AI visibility
Web design